From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8b002e3d2f652e7a441fb8044b160ceb@swcp.com>
References: <d148270eed15139860fbaeff50fed15c@swcp.com>
	<AANLkTimfii3j3qsbnu=EO=Ec9cCBf3FY19yRFoPazkp=@mail.gmail.com>
	<8b002e3d2f652e7a441fb8044b160ceb@swcp.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:05:41 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTik8MmCA1Z8ueV8XiwWGA7oDD1ah=07DMbxNjUr4@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Devon H. O'Dell" <devon.odell@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] source header question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 498489e2-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

2010/8/20 EBo <ebo@sandien.com>:
>
>
>> i guess you answered that yourself. does p9p run on Plan 9?
>
> There a plenty of programs which are made to run under both p9p and plan9=
.
> So, no the question is still open, but I will rephrase it.
>
> Should any program which can run under p9p and plan9 ever be compiled wit=
h
> g++ or another c++ compilers? =A0Otherwise is it necessary to check for
> __cplusplus?

I think it may be for Sun compilers.

--dho

> =A0 EBo --
>
>
>