9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akshat Kumar <akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] auth server with two NICs
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:55:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikCiUL6jiL75vlCbqMGxkxMbDoBNYzygH7rBzho@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b531b6b4731db24073f6404b374c8eb@brasstown.quanstro.net>

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:30 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> a bad network?

I thought so at first, but if instead of using separate /net and /net.alt
mountpoints for the two networks, I simply, as I said before,

bind -b '#l1' /net
bind -b '#I1' /net

and start auth service, etc., afterwards (so that they start only on
the external interface), then from testing last night, there is no such
lag in drawterm or dropped packets on ping. now, it could just be
the timing of things (like, when I tested, etc.)... but if I drawterm to
a remote network, it's *much* faster, and pinging around to other
things doesn't cause dropped packets.

So, I'm lead to believe that the problem is in a configuration of
two network interfaces, where the default is the internal network,
which is bound to /net, and the external network is bound to /net.alt
is there some reason or way that incoming calls could be confused,
or it might take time for the server to find the right place to reply
from? I dunno... but the performance is killing me.



  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-22 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-21  7:58 Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 12:38 ` erik quanstrom
2010-07-21 16:12   ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 16:24     ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 17:31     ` erik quanstrom
2010-07-21 21:50       ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 22:01         ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 23:38           ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-22 17:25             ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-22 17:30               ` erik quanstrom
2010-07-22 17:55                 ` Akshat Kumar [this message]
2010-07-22 20:15                   ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 16:03 ` Akshat Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTikCiUL6jiL75vlCbqMGxkxMbDoBNYzygH7rBzho@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).