From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <68638b4d5ce91576c9c27e434824c8be@kw.quanstro.net> References: <68638b4d5ce91576c9c27e434824c8be@kw.quanstro.net> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:57:37 +0300 Message-ID: From: James Chapman To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] soverflow for fx->in Topicbox-Message-UUID: 43e35996-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Thanks Erik. Removing the first instance of the print in /sys/src/9/pc/devether.c appears to fix it: /* print("soverflow for f->in\n"); */ There is another another print lower down but I left this there for the mom= ent. term% time upas/fs -f /imaps/imap.gmail.com/address_removed@gmail.com !Adding key: proto=3Dpass server=3Dimap.gmail.com service=3Dimap user=3Daddress_removed@gmail.com password: ! 0.21u 1.04s 35.59r upas/fs -f /imaps/imap.gmail.com/address_removed@gmail= .com This was for 595 messages actually. Many thanks, James On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 7:52 AM, erik quanstrom wro= te: >> Also, I just did a pull from sources which appears to have updated >> almost the complete contents of /386. This caused the "soverflow for >> fx->in" message to appear. I had to run pull three times to get it to >> finish. > > maybe my first message wasn't that clear. =A0any ethernet activity > can cause this if the input queue can't be drained fast enough. > clearly, too much of the cpu is spent in interrupt context receiving > packets, and not enough processing them. but delete the print, and > tcp congestion avoidance should make up the difference fast enough > to keep the remote happy. > > - erik > >