From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7ae079e8c3fd3f1bb06812607300224d@terzarima.net> References: <7ae079e8c3fd3f1bb06812607300224d@terzarima.net> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 07:57:49 -0800 Message-ID: From: Jack Johnson To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] license situation and OSI Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2a6efff6-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Charles Forsyth wr= ote: >>You don't get to change the license > > ``3. REQUIREMENTS > A. Distributor may choose to distribute the Program in any form under > this Agreement or under its own license agreement, provided that: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0... > =A0c. if distributed under Distributor's own license agreement, such > =A0 =A0license agreement: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0... [conditions placed on an alternative licence, includin= g spelling out the differences] > '' I've always thought this was an entertaining perspective on licensing. Really there are just two kinds of licenses: ones that allow relicensing and ones that don't. Kinda puts MS and EFF in the same camp. -Jack