From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <50786da82a7de0d4c55dcfacdfb3d3b1@ladd.quanstro.net> References: <319CCC8A-7CC8-4814-8608-FFFA624C04FD@gmail.com> <96B1444A-B40A-4F42-A387-1129C87D1387@gmail.com> <36690C89-48E9-4DA3-8C47-426756A2F819@gmail.com> <50786da82a7de0d4c55dcfacdfb3d3b1@ladd.quanstro.net> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:44:46 +0000 Message-ID: From: roger peppe To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] streams Topicbox-Message-UUID: b2c6cd84-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 22 February 2011 13:25, erik quanstrom wrote: >> i've also been experimenting with a 9p modification that >> suggested some while ago, allowing multiple outstanding >> requests to be queued in sequence. it works, but the code >> still needs quite a bit of polishing. > > queued or sent? sent, then queued at the server side if necessary.