From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinsU8eFPmX4p6gnWOC7JAyKSO12YVKJwurejM2b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=CAkadvRdveeCPuyE18Xm9LC7gft6Negr4D2aG@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinsU8eFPmX4p6gnWOC7JAyKSO12YVKJwurejM2b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:53 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikZ2kugvFe9xu3-KhwVV6WU3QzNTkYmeWfQjG+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Don Bailey <don.bailey@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] VMware resolution > 1024?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7a6b9366-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Yeah, that's a fair solution. I already have an Auth, CPU, and FS
server in my VMware network. I was hoping to use VMware for
everything, though.

D

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:16 AM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's not a solution to your problem, but what I typically like to do for a
> console these days is use either 9vx or drawterm, and then setup VMWare as a
> CPU/FS server.
> Dave
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Don Bailey <don.bailey@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Am I missing something? VMware used to have better screen resolution
>> than 1024x768x8, didn't it? I'm getting kernel panic when I try and
>> switch to something higher. Suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> D
>>
>
>