From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yiyu.jgl@gmail.com (yy) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:47:58 +0200 Subject: [9fans] problem with rminnich's 9vx In-Reply-To: <11e5bc89749dfdd2bee8cf4ecd94f52c@smgl.homelinux.net> References: <11e5bc89749dfdd2bee8cf4ecd94f52c@smgl.homelinux.net> Message-ID: Topicbox-Message-UUID: c2c40e68-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 ron's 9vx and mine are compiled differently in 64bits systems, so you can try mine and see if there is any difference, but I don't really know. I don't have any x86_64 system I can use to test 9vx, so please let me know if things get better (or worse). If you don't want to download the whole vx32 tree again you can just rollback the last changes by ron and compile that, the result will be the same. > what do you guys for a tree > with ron's 9vx? For testing, I always use a plan9.iso file (a full tree can solve some problems but I don't think it will solve yours). When I need write permissions I use a kfs file I filled with the contents of the iso. -- - yiyus || JGL .