On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:54 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> There was some mention that, during the history of Plan 9, developers
> had difficulty maintaining two different languages on the system.  I
> wonder how much of that difficulty would still apply today.  Although
> the kernel could concievably be translated to a modern compiled
> language, I doubt it could be written in Go.  If Go were used, then,
> there would still have to be two languages/compilers/development
> environments on the system.

although the proof is in the putting, i don't see why a kernel
in principle, can't be written in go, or a slightly restricted subset
of go.

Wait, isn't it "the proof is in the *pudding*"?  YOU MEAN WE DON'T GET FRENCH BENEFITS!?!
 

- erik