From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mathieu.lonjaret@gmail.com (Mathieu Lonjaret)
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:49:20 +0200
Subject: [9fans] problem with rminnich's 9vx
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikeyXONQchvOhieD1e-Jp+1vDxsFUpy3rQ7AA3r@mail.gmail.com>
References: <11e5bc89749dfdd2bee8cf4ecd94f52c@smgl.homelinux.net>
	<AANLkTikeyXONQchvOhieD1e-Jp+1vDxsFUpy3rQ7AA3r@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikv8KBdosw-JE_sD-6GySimSQSJSOCN6du8TU-2@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c2d16dba-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Good call; yours starts without a problem, thanks.

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:47 AM, yy <yiyu.jgl at gmail.com> wrote:
> ron's 9vx and mine are compiled differently in 64bits systems, so you
> can try mine and see if there is any difference, but I don't really
> know. I don't have any x86_64 system I can use to test 9vx, so please
> let me know if things get better (or worse). If you don't want to
> download the whole vx32 tree again you can just rollback the last
> changes by ron and compile that, the result will be the same.
>
>> what do you guys for a tree
>> with ron's 9vx?
>
> For testing, I always use a plan9.iso file (a full tree can solve some
> problems but I don't think it will solve yours). When I need write
> permissions I use a kfs file I filled with the contents of the iso.
>
>
> --
> - yiyus || JGL .
>