From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikr+x5ZjCfHt+FW1_B0=UEXyg-9Gyjgsxa8pNOy@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20101115032531.GB27578@opal.ai.ki>
	<AANLkTikr+x5ZjCfHt+FW1_B0=UEXyg-9Gyjgsxa8pNOy@mail.gmail.com>
From: Venkatesh Srinivas <me@acm.jhu.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:55:24 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTikvWTqtnf=mv-bFrSJQq7bOtBHVet3inUZZSa=R@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p vs http
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7effd3ec-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Under certain situations, 9p can do some forms of pipelining. =C2=A0The t=
agged
> requests don't have to be waited on in order, for the next outgoing reque=
st
> to be sent, unless there's a dependency of one completing before the othe=
r,
> or the evaluation of completion of a previous one on another.

Only if the file & file server involved are decent.

-- vs