From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19b728d48aa74d67b8402c1b9727c80e@coraid.com> References: <464534aea8c7fffa248a1368c41acb55@proxima.alt.za> <19b728d48aa74d67b8402c1b9727c80e@coraid.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:45:44 -0500 Message-ID: From: Eric Van Hensbergen To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] Go/Inferno toolchain (Was: comment and newline in Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3a648430-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 erik's attempt is now in the go-plan9 repo under its own branch for those that wish to take a look. Hopefully I merged it properly. -eric On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:32 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> a) Simple logistics (makefile/script transformations, Sape's branch >> has some of this, what the right way to do this in order to be >> integrated back into the mainline go tree is an open question) > [...] >> >> I wonder if one way of avoiding (a) is just to rig to cross-compile >> from Linux/MacOSX to Plan 9 and get (b) and (c) done first then work >> back to (a), just because it seems like it would be more satisfying. > > i found that (a) wasn't hard. =A0i got everything compiled > rather quickly, but something came up before i could get > going on the runtime. > > - erik > >