From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <32ae739c22eb486931dd7bb207949f0e@swcp.com> <79c8278e45da12f71df95a90c8df246f@swcp.com> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:58:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: ron minnich To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] Tvx update Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2ab59826-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Nick LaForge wrot= e: > I tried it and it is very fast to boot and run. =C2=A0However, the wrappe= r > did not copy Tvx-root to my home dir. =C2=A0Option 2 links to the package > install in /usr/local, but option 1 also links, but to the package > loopback mount in /tmp. Is this because option 2 is the persistent install and option 1 is not? Note the loopback mounts are readonly squashfs mounts. >=C2=A0The only files in my home are in the top > directory (the license, etc.). =C2=A0Writing to the symlinks fails. =C2= =A0And so > does reading utf8 filenames. Be careful .. did you set up a persistent /home? I'm not sure what you have done. There's no substitute at some point for seeing how things work at tinycore.org. cd /sys/doc ls | grep 8 8 cd 8 Can't cd 8: '8' file does not exist cd 8=C2=BD Can't cd 8=C2=BD: '8=C2=BD' file does not exist cd 8? ls 8?.ms 8=EF=BF=BD.ms touch 9=C2=BD ls 9=C2=BD 9=C2=BD That's an interesting problem. I wonder if it is some artifact of the use of squashfs. The sam and venti directories are fine. This may be a flaw in tinycore ... we'll talk to them. Thanks for the testing. I have found one thing out ... I don't think 9vx is SMP-safe. I've had some real problems building in /sys/src, where 9vx gets a segv on "cpu 5" or whatever. If I boot with only one cpu, there are no problems. Worth keeping in mind ... I may modify my version of 9vx to wire itself to cpu 0, as well as its children, and see if the failures I'm seeing go away. That's a pointer at least to where the issues may be. Also ... >sed '43 s/H/L/' Tvx Sorry, you lost me. >Why are there TWO ways for cp to follow symlinks? Why are there >symlinks it all? (That should do it.) They're not going away I bet, but what are you talking about here? ron