From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20100519171832.72D915B8A@mail.bitblocks.com> <20100519182303.2C04E5B8A@mail.bitblocks.com> <20100519203038.416E85B8A@mail.bitblocks.com> <20100519220234.DB9CD5B8A@mail.bitblocks.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 23:46:16 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Devon H. O'Dell" To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] system call trace version of 9vx available. Topicbox-Message-UUID: 28415be8-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 2010/5/19 ron minnich : > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Bakul Shah wrote: > >>> It gives you the option of not restarting the system call until later. >>> There could be more complex usage scenarios. >> >> I don't understand this. > > You read the "start of the system call" message. The process is > stopped. It has not run the system call. > > You have a lot of options at that point. You could, programatically, > drop the person into acid (the debugger, not the liquid) and, when > they exit, resume the process. You really do have lots of control. But there's nothing more fun than watching someone scream in a HCl bath of high molarity, especially after they've made a dumb programming error! (Sorry for the noise, I had to.) --dho