From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8055D71E-EEAA-4812-AB39-518A9F70F21C@corpus-callosum.com>
References: <8055D71E-EEAA-4812-AB39-518A9F70F21C@corpus-callosum.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:33:17 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTilzi57Zu2XwfipTdVy28h1pjN3abXdUYC_DM75B@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] installing on a usb disk
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 404dba2e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>
> If I do:
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0usb/disk
>
> I get "no device found". =C2=A0But if instead the command is:
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0usb/usbfat:
>
> I get /dev/sdU0.0 and /dev/sdU0.1 with plausible trees (ctl data raw). =
=C2=A0The sdU0.0 corresponds to a usb/probe that returns:
>

Are you running usbd with embedded disks? In that case the disks are owned =
by
the usb/disk linked into usbd, and the one you start by hand should
see no disks, as it happens.
I'd like to confirm this, just to know if it's a bug.