From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com (Skip Tavakkolian)
Date: Sat,  2 Apr 2011 19:18:32 -0700
Subject: [9fans] Go Plan 9
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=7L-mqU=mFODnGcYCmyvR02M=MLFzKPpH2v2B1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik3gx8QK7O-+O=R8oFELTt6WgVHO3dJV51cZiPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=7L-mqU=mFODnGcYCmyvR02M=MLFzKPpH2v2B1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim1g8pebwHbUEtLocwfuYzvxErqwuvAe5pF-+pT@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c653dc5c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Thank you!

FYI, I'm building on Ubungo 10.10, I'm getting several packages that
aren't building (io/ioutil, tabwriter, time - so far); most seem to be
lack of or conflict in definitions in os.* and syscall.*. Is this
expected?

This just gave me more ammunition to convince some Seattle Gophers
that Plan 9 is NOT dead.

-Skip

On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Pavel Zholkover <paulzhol at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Rob just committed my syscall and os Plan 9 patches into mainline.
>
> The produced binaries do not run properly on 9vx since the last gc changes
> so its native or kvm+qemu etc.
>
> Please test :)
>
> Pavel