i think we're reducing this down to "it's easy to cache the hellOn Fri Oct 29 13:15:45 EDT 2010, forsyth@terzarima.net wrote:
> > Let's try to define 'decent' for this thread -- a decent fileserver is one
> > on which close()s do not have any client-visible or semantic effect other
> > than to invalidate the Fid that was passed to them. Lets see how many file
> > servers we can think of that are 'decent': fossil, kfs, ken, memfs, ...
>
> unfortunately, fossil and kfs both can have important visible state changes on a clunk,
> so that lets them out.
out of immutable files".
- erik