From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <eedb37c4131c320215524e3cead63b36@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <f3069c0f0c04613da64612ab236a0a27@quintile.net>
	<86ipx4s36p.fsf@cmarib.ramside>
	<AANLkTi=-HGocKSwQpBVg2TfygYUk5khG8dsWvmnoOc9y@mail.gmail.com>
	<86ei7ry76s.fsf@cmarib.ramside>
	<AANLkTin66np3zUfTewfPYX5fcRDSoPV=ufWEvrxCGejt@mail.gmail.com>
	<86zkqf46vz.fsf@cmarib.ramside>
	<AANLkTiknRCp2M-87Xo0TmDT2VZuMEVapyd3fdJL70pmK@mail.gmail.com>
	<86mxmfuiep.fsf_-_@cmarib.ramside>
	<AANLkTikpTUaKGAcP9p_Xso96c_cOF9Qui5rrXhUu1BDX@mail.gmail.com>
	<be3e16017566e26d4074ae69bc9b12c2@chula.quanstro.net>
	<AANLkTimsq8GPGyOsk0WV4QeDsJnzoAO6GRgGPfu==9sE@mail.gmail.com>
	<eedb37c4131c320215524e3cead63b36@brasstown.quanstro.net>
Date: Wed,  2 Feb 2011 10:46:12 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTim4npVqkgBSqXNeF1H5rsQdUWX=nCDBQQgPEvyW@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9,
 WAS: Re: RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a88f9d6e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wednesday, February 2, 2011, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrot=
e:
>> Also, from this point of view, could pthreads be considered runtime for =
C?
>
> no. =A0then every library/os function ever bolted onto
> c would be "part of the c runtime". =A0clearly this isn't
> the case and pthreads are not specified in the c standard.
>
> it might be part of /a/ runtime, but not the c runtime.
>
> - erik
>
>

You are right.  I suppose in C only the stack space is really needed
for function calls and that may be pushing it too.