From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20101028153711.GC5777@masters1.cs.jhu.edu>
References: <AANLkTinEZZu-8qKfh6u3qdcJbcE6M_=eQjqBxP_2PkCG@mail.gmail.com>
	<d555a1ae7e1735204d7ee20381034260@terzarima.net>
	<AANLkTikj+kT7f_UHMmXeBXd1NmfqBWP7oaeShywowv3D@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinKOfMCGoE6H1tb3n=o4kjaLuTrr6V5H-USQt+T@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimFNWT4VToNtp6vZ1bENfDFindbd5oRC+fs=_wQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikTbRwviRPBmpjfBRSD0Rs+egRUUaXk2ex7p_Db@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101028153711.GC5777@masters1.cs.jhu.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:53:47 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimA6YNtqoGpJJ9-QNtU3DDeTom0gmYm-8Ww788o@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] A little more ado about async Tclunk
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 707e6fb8-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Yes, in general, agree, but this was about clunk usage and
semantics, and I think it's important to have the I'm done message
synchronous when you need that.

Btw, I think you mean Tstat, don't you?
I'm not sure Twstat would work that way in practice.