On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:56 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>wrote:

> > In longer terms, I'd also replace mozilla's handling of other
> > protocols, eg. ftp, by an webfs implementation.
> >
> >
> > What do you think about this ?
>
> webfs is client side, not server side.
>
> - erik
>
> I must confess, I understood the question more than this comment.

Why not use webfs for Mozilla?  How much code could be saved by re-using the
webfs service?