On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:56 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> In longer terms, I'd also replace mozilla's handling of other
> protocols, eg. ftp, by an webfs implementation.
>
>
> What do you think about this ?

webfs is client side, not server side.

- erik

I must confess, I understood the question more than this comment.

Why not use webfs for Mozilla?  How much code could be saved by re-using the webfs service?