On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:56 PM, erik quanstrom
<quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> In longer terms, I'd also replace mozilla's handling of other
> protocols, eg. ftp, by an webfs implementation.
>
>
> What do you think about this ?
webfs is client side, not server side.
- erik
I must confess, I understood the question more than this comment.Why not use webfs for Mozilla? How much code could be saved by re-using the webfs service?