From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx, kproc and *double sleep*
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:30:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimFWKiVUowEyMOehT5r3fs--xdv25eS05g8zoG5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f2f260287a298258551d6fd2c767c48@hamnavoe.com>
There's kind of an interesting similarity here to what I had to deal
with on the Xen port.
So, a few random thoughts, probably useless, from early problems of
this sort I've had.
- in Linux parlance, Plan 9 is a "preemptible" kernel. Interrupt
handlers can be interrupted, so to speak. Except for the clock
interrupt handler: you have to check the interrupt number to make sure
you are not pre-empting the clock interrupt handler. Sorry if I'm not
saying this very well. On Xen and lguest I had to make sure of this (I
mention this in the lguest port talk slides)
- splhi -- it's not a true splhi in some sense; is it possible that
some code is sneaking in and running even when you splhi()? Could this
explain it?
- What other aspect of the transition from hardware to
software-in-sandbox might explain a non-premptible bit of code getting
pre-empted?
OK, back to fixing my 1990 civic :-)
ron
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-12 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-11 14:06 Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 14:40 ` ron minnich
2010-06-11 14:49 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-11 14:54 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 15:03 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-11 15:22 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 15:25 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 14:59 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 17:11 ` Bakul Shah
2010-06-11 17:31 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 18:34 ` Bakul Shah
2010-06-11 18:36 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-11 18:51 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-12 7:02 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-12 9:22 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-12 11:51 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-13 13:01 ` Richard Miller
2010-06-13 13:43 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-13 14:26 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-13 16:20 ` ron minnich
2010-06-13 16:34 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-13 17:23 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-13 18:03 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-14 19:15 ` Charles Forsyth
2010-06-14 19:36 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-15 2:57 ` ron minnich
2010-06-15 3:36 ` ron minnich
2010-06-12 20:15 ` Richard Miller
2010-06-12 20:30 ` ron minnich [this message]
2010-06-12 22:15 ` Charles Forsyth
2010-06-13 0:04 ` ron minnich
2010-06-13 13:32 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-13 22:34 ` Charles Forsyth
2010-06-13 9:00 ` Richard Miller
2010-06-11 14:49 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 14:59 ` ron minnich
2010-06-11 15:02 ` ron minnich
2010-06-11 15:04 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-11 15:43 ` ron minnich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimFWKiVUowEyMOehT5r3fs--xdv25eS05g8zoG5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rminnich@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).