From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinzp9f4MkaP2r+yyKEuO5QJQ9T8EBJT6D_yrKY8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik2dSzomUZN=RUOA1m7VwsNZD4+uL+7TEfVVRg7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimWbipYGqZ7ekX8f4cxSSeJ0n5u8CuKJw64TrQo@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimW7DGwc84ZpWiEmP0OycA8cGv+SCpPs8n3ztmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinzp9f4MkaP2r+yyKEuO5QJQ9T8EBJT6D_yrKY8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:02:45 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimHka+nrq4fwhRiGSAxj5n6sAe_V0tCtZy-BHsL@mail.gmail.com>
From: andrey mirtchovski <mirtchovski@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] `mk` (from Plan9 ports) efficiency related issue
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9d2db17c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

something else to try if you're on a multiprocessor system: set $NPROC
to a value > 1 and see how this affects the runtime in the 14-second
case. your dependency tree may be very deep, but parallelizable.