From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fs performance
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:07:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimThYi5QstzFadnqqe1Xcndom5QNyYhteYzU9=v@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinvT8hro+skD=qtnbyQOSPdB6X8jWEmwUFo3jyx@mail.gmail.com>
>
> Right, my results were that you get pretty much exactly the same
> performance when you're working over a LAN whether you choose streams
> or regular 9P. Streaming only really starts to help when you're up
> into the multiple-millisecond RTT range.
This is weird. Didn't read the thesis yet, sorry, but, do you know the reason?
I think that when I measured op I found that even on lans, using get instead
of multiple rpcs was measurable. Of course users would not notice unless latency
gets higher or many rpcs add their times.
thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-10 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-09 17:06 erik quanstrom
2011-01-09 17:29 ` ron minnich
2011-01-09 17:51 ` John Floren
2011-01-10 18:07 ` Francisco J Ballesteros [this message]
2011-01-10 18:48 ` hiro
2011-01-10 19:06 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-10 19:53 ` John Floren
2011-01-11 11:33 ` hiro
2011-01-09 18:31 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-09 19:54 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-09 20:25 ` ron minnich
2011-01-09 20:47 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-09 21:04 ` ron minnich
2011-01-09 21:17 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-09 21:59 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-09 22:58 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-01-09 22:55 ` ron minnich
2011-01-09 23:50 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-01-10 3:26 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-09 21:14 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-09 21:38 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-09 21:56 ` ron minnich
2011-01-09 22:02 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-10 14:45 ` David Leimbach
2011-01-10 15:06 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-01-09 22:00 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-10 3:57 erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTimThYi5QstzFadnqqe1Xcndom5QNyYhteYzU9=v@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=nemo@lsub.org \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).