On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nemo <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:nemo.mbox@gmail.com">nemo.mbox@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">

<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>i have decent servers that wait for clunk to operate on written data once it&#39;s complete. all octopus spoolers do that. </div><div><div></div><div class="h5"><div><br></div></div></div></div>

</blockquote><div><br>Heh; when I wrote &#39;decent&#39;, I was recalling the old proposed QTDECENT qid type. I didn&#39;t mean to impugn your file servers; they&#39;re probably very nice people and if I met them, I&#39;d should buy them a drink.<br>

<br>Let&#39;s try to define &#39;decent&#39; for this thread -- a decent fileserver is one on which close()s do not have any client-visible or semantic effect other than to invalidate the Fid that was passed to them. Lets see how many file servers we can think of that are &#39;decent&#39;: fossil, kfs, ken, memfs, ...<br>

<br clear="all">-- vs<br>
</div></div>