From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2BAAB6BE-154C-433E-8ECA-9FCA30A9EC11@mac.com> References: <4C1F05E7-B327-480A-91F3-055076377C99@fastmail.fm> <3633bacf2efc9da1b911893b4029531b@coraid.com> <2BAAB6BE-154C-433E-8ECA-9FCA30A9EC11@mac.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:04:12 -0400 Message-ID: From: Corey Thomasson To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] xml Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3beb65a8-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 30 June 2010 15:54, Pietro Gagliardi wrote: > A friend on AIM who I showed this quote to suggested XML should drop named > close tags as a solution: stuff > "C and Ratfor programmers find BEGIN and END bulky compared to { and }." - > bwk > The suggestion has come up 8000 times in as many forums, to no avail. Supposedly, the excess verbosity makes it more readable/less error-prone.