From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100520002640.B8E035B58@mail.bitblocks.com> References: <20100519171832.72D915B8A@mail.bitblocks.com> <20100519182303.2C04E5B8A@mail.bitblocks.com> <20100519203038.416E85B8A@mail.bitblocks.com> <20100519220234.DB9CD5B8A@mail.bitblocks.com> <20100520002640.B8E035B58@mail.bitblocks.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:32:19 -0700 Message-ID: From: ron minnich To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] system call trace version of 9vx available. Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2858330e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Bakul Shah wro= te: > time ratrace -o /dev/null -c mk # about 19.67 seconds did you want [2]>/dev/null? > mk clean > time mk =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 # about 0.88 seco= nds > > And here I thought naming it ratrace would make it go faster. Speed is left as an exercise for the reader. But, if you want, you can use ratrace to trace ratrace to see how long things take. I assume it is the cost of doing the output, but who knows? ron