From: Akshat Kumar <akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] auth server with two NICs
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:15:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimlMqe8vVj98lXmYPUvviXgdpByDDCBuuqIFUeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikCiUL6jiL75vlCbqMGxkxMbDoBNYzygH7rBzho@mail.gmail.com>
nevermind, it's the network... or hardware...
I tried just the very basic setup at the top of
http://www.9grid.fr/www.9grid.fr/wiki/plan9/Drawterm_to_your_terminal/
and I get the same poor performance. network
sux!
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Akshat Kumar
<akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:30 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> a bad network?
>
> I thought so at first, but if instead of using separate /net and /net.alt
> mountpoints for the two networks, I simply, as I said before,
>
> bind -b '#l1' /net
> bind -b '#I1' /net
>
> and start auth service, etc., afterwards (so that they start only on
> the external interface), then from testing last night, there is no such
> lag in drawterm or dropped packets on ping. now, it could just be
> the timing of things (like, when I tested, etc.)... but if I drawterm to
> a remote network, it's *much* faster, and pinging around to other
> things doesn't cause dropped packets.
>
> So, I'm lead to believe that the problem is in a configuration of
> two network interfaces, where the default is the internal network,
> which is bound to /net, and the external network is bound to /net.alt
> is there some reason or way that incoming calls could be confused,
> or it might take time for the server to find the right place to reply
> from? I dunno... but the performance is killing me.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-21 7:58 Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 12:38 ` erik quanstrom
2010-07-21 16:12 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 16:24 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 17:31 ` erik quanstrom
2010-07-21 21:50 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 22:01 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 23:38 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-22 17:25 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-22 17:30 ` erik quanstrom
2010-07-22 17:55 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-22 20:15 ` Akshat Kumar [this message]
2010-07-21 16:03 ` Akshat Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimlMqe8vVj98lXmYPUvviXgdpByDDCBuuqIFUeA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).