From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikjKF4LkSNac36dQZgd6DLTUMkr-Inwsp3L3Iyq@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C028B75.8080701@bouyapop.org>
	<520680.8420.qm@web83905.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
	<AANLkTim8OnsuqJf3xbJsnjQKg4-in78cAvNt5rXXVka-@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikjKF4LkSNac36dQZgd6DLTUMkr-Inwsp3L3Iyq@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jorden M <jrm8005@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 16:46:57 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimmcbGIlUDCp0HADRIE8eIgTgojap7nD6I4R-hf@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] crashing 9vx
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2df16baa-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:32 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> So can we sum up the 9vx state?
>
> Here's my summary:
> tinycore, 2.6.32, gcc 4.4.3
> 1. pretty easy to blow up with an hget of the plan 9 iso on SMP, -O3
> 2. lotsafiles *sometimes* fails, other times runs with no trouble on SMP, -O3
> 3. rebuild without -O3, and it is quite solid

Maybe newer GCC versions are causing trouble? Would it be worth it to
try compiling with a GCC 3.x and seeing if the problem goes away?

>
> If we can get a reasonable list, we can try to get to a reproducer.
> losafiles is not it I think. Also, if this discussion is annoying
> anyone who is only concerned with Plan 9 :-) we might want to move to
> a different list.
>
> thanks
>
> ron
>
>