From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:49:51 +0200 Message-ID: From: Eugene Gorodinsky To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e1fa4ed69aac049c27b0e5 Subject: [9fans] Is there a reason for the existence of 9atom? Topicbox-Message-UUID: ade55588-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001636e1fa4ed69aac049c27b0e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This question has been bugging me for some time and I haven't found any discussions on the matter. It seems that at least the devices support could go into the original plan9 kernel. What's the reason for having a fork? --001636e1fa4ed69aac049c27b0e5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This question has been bugging me for some time and I haven't found any= discussions on the matter. It seems that at least the devices support coul= d go into the original plan9 kernel. What's the reason for having a for= k?=C2=A0 --001636e1fa4ed69aac049c27b0e5--