From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim=6b0TT=mFnyBrNmGksXfg9=LFE+203C3eDKq3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=Xi9y5XygL_aMf4mHU_jons=qAtHLnnZ3Ozb3O@mail.gmail.com>
	<94b72a275de4f8e6440aa79508edb7a4@terzarima.net>
	<AANLkTikWnOwEOMrnScP1y3g=AQ1an-6oNtD5Ds-nWJXP@mail.gmail.com>
	<8426d01eb3f1d86b5f9e8a50efb3e8c6@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<AANLkTim=6b0TT=mFnyBrNmGksXfg9=LFE+203C3eDKq3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:33:06 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimzj7zfBBEKcn+Z=FNrgP=uf5unjaPCDO9B9EQ2@mail.gmail.com>
From: roger peppe <rogpeppe@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] A little more ado about async Tclunk
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 72a2624a-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 29 October 2010 18:47, Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com> wrote:
> who said deadlock. it's an easily reproducible situation. rattle the
> cage is not a solution.

sorry then, i misunderstood you. what else did you mean by "deadly embrace"?