From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E93B3E06-29F0-4301-B40E-115FFA8C6ECD@9srv.net>
References: <E93B3E06-29F0-4301-B40E-115FFA8C6ECD@9srv.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:45:36 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTin0twzSRyPRBoZhTurXR6zkzB_SXT38GSDgu9_S@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gorka Guardiola <paurea@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] PAM?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8d381cc6-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

This probably can be a good start if it didn't proceed further.

http://plan9.bell-labs.com/iwp9/papers/13.p9auth.pdf
http://gsoc.cat-v.org/hg/lincapdevice/
http://gsoc.cat-v.org/hg/p9pauthsrv/




On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net> wrote:
> I know it's come up several times, but has anyone actually
> gotten anywhere with a PAM module which authenticates
> against factotum (preferable) or does p9any/p9sk1 itself?
> Any stage of progress would be welcome.
>
>



--
- curiosity sKilled the cat