From: Akshat Kumar <akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] auth server with two NICs
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:38:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin43A2qrqJ2GcVfEZa02fqIcoF97Yq5TEu0Ccut@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimk71pSvh9WkatIJjv8vuo-aNiPW1smOceQjgXp@mail.gmail.com>
I ended up doing:
bind -b '#l1' /net
bind -b '#I1' /net
so that the public network is
what's used by default... but
in plan9.ini, I have:
fs=192.168.100.1
auth=192.168.100.2
where 192.168.100.2 is the IP
of the CPU/Auth server on the
internal network, so whenever
anything (say, auth/factotum)
looks for $auth, it can't connect
to 192.168.100.2... is there any
way to setup this multi-network
multi-stack crap, so it isn't so
messy??
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Akshat Kumar
<akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
> the real problem I'm having is that in the process
> of getting its root fs, the auth server associates
> #I with #l; I would like for it to associate #I1 with
> #l instead. If I switch ether0 and ether1 around,
> it will associate #I with #l1, but in that case, I
> would like #I1 to be associated with #l1... so
> this problem persists no matter what. Any
> setup suggestions? how do people usually
> handle multiple networks on multiple interfaces?
>
> with the current setup, I'd have to start all my
> listeners on /net.alt, where #I1 is bound, but
> that seems messier than just fixing one thing.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Akshat Kumar
> <akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
>> the following bootargs line:
>>
>> bootargs=il -x /net.alt -g 192.168.100.1 ether /net.alt/ether0
>> 192.168.100.2 255.255.255.0
>>
>> gives the following startup error:
>>
>> boot: bind #I: %r
>> : '/net/net.alt': does not exist
>>
>> what's the proper way to bind the interface from which I get root,
>> into /net.alt?
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-21 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-21 7:58 Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 12:38 ` erik quanstrom
2010-07-21 16:12 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 16:24 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 17:31 ` erik quanstrom
2010-07-21 21:50 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 22:01 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 23:38 ` Akshat Kumar [this message]
2010-07-22 17:25 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-22 17:30 ` erik quanstrom
2010-07-22 17:55 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-22 20:15 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-07-21 16:03 ` Akshat Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTin43A2qrqJ2GcVfEZa02fqIcoF97Yq5TEu0Ccut@mail.gmail.com \
--to=akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).