From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <102330783065a9f2532aaf0004dba714@plug.quanstro.net>
References: <AANLkTi=xzN+U5PmbOriewC9Zzp=VqgM2mPLrfeUzhg=T@mail.gmail.com>
	<102330783065a9f2532aaf0004dba714@plug.quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 00:31:54 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTin5gGCp7zW3CMgucAy6UeZWi6bLdbq16BNO3Q2b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Don Bailey <don.bailey@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] another type of static linking: send all the shared
 libraries with the program!
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7bdb121c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

So now bin/ls is going to weigh 200 megabytes on SomeDistro thanks to
a packaging of localities, terminal colours, etc? Sounds great.

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:26 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> So they've made the whole shared library mess so incredibly complex
>> that you now have to bundle a program's shared libraries with the
>> program!
>>
>> Un-beeeeee-lievable.
>>
>> The standard rule is, when you're in a hole, stop digging; that seems
>> not to apply in software nowadays.
>
> why does this sound like post-compile autoconf/autotools?
>
> - erik
>
>