From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4C151D6A.8000903@bouyapop.org>
References: <8ebe5bdc32ec6d9b7efc27b0b0b3697c@hamnavoe.com>
	<4C14EA90.8020108@bouyapop.org>
	<AANLkTinQ86A6xtPrpWBukwdsZBOPBoDUUPu-coSuDkjl@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C151D6A.8000903@bouyapop.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:36:06 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTin6x0-5LjxVoJl8qCXky4be_nWjwtosiMEm5UCY@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx, kproc and *double sleep*
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 337ac9ae-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Philippe Anel <xigh@bouyapop.org> wrote:
> I tried with adding :
>
> =A0 while (p->mach)
> =A0 =A0 =A0 sched_yield();
>
>
> at the end of sched.c:^runproc(), before the return.
>
> It seems to work well.
>
> What do you think ?

Not sure I understand all the implications but I'll try anything at
this point :-)

I'm trying now with -O3 back on. The -O3 was a red herring.

ron