From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4C14EA90.8020108@bouyapop.org>
References: <8ebe5bdc32ec6d9b7efc27b0b0b3697c@hamnavoe.com>
	<4C14EA90.8020108@bouyapop.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:20:27 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinQ86A6xtPrpWBukwdsZBOPBoDUUPu-coSuDkjl@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx, kproc and *double sleep*
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3238d5e0-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Philippe Anel <xigh@bouyapop.org> wrote:
> In fact you're right, and this shows us this would only happens to 9vx.
> Indeed, the proc is a kproc and thus is not scheduled by the 9vx/a/proc.c
> scheduler,
> but by the one in 9vx/sched.c ... where dequeueproc() is not called and
> where p->mach
> is not checked.

So is changing 9vx/sched.c to do these two steps the real fix?

ron