From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx, kproc and *double sleep*
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:04:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinYy93SV-2xTKvQiYRo0p_2OPrUJPBKrU6A02HL@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64a6fa23d8a01d86312954ab451692d0@terzarima.net>
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
>>in Linux parlance, Plan 9 is a "preemptible" kernel. Interrupt handlers can be interrupted, so to speak.
>
> interrupt handlers are not normally interruptible during the interrupt
> processing, but rather at the end (eg, when anyhigher, anyready or preempted
> is called).
Yes, I was not careful enough in how I said that.
For those who wonder what I was trying to say, see trap(); note what
happens after the isr() is called and look where preempted() is
called.
But, all this said, the problems we're seeing on 9vx are strangely
similar to the ones I had on Xen when code that was not supposed to be
interrupted got interrupted. There may be no real connection at all
however.
ron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-13 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-11 14:06 Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 14:40 ` ron minnich
2010-06-11 14:49 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-11 14:54 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 15:03 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-11 15:22 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 15:25 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 14:59 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 17:11 ` Bakul Shah
2010-06-11 17:31 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 18:34 ` Bakul Shah
2010-06-11 18:36 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-11 18:51 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-12 7:02 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-12 9:22 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-12 11:51 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-13 13:01 ` Richard Miller
2010-06-13 13:43 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-13 14:26 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-13 16:20 ` ron minnich
2010-06-13 16:34 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-13 17:23 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-13 18:03 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-14 19:15 ` Charles Forsyth
2010-06-14 19:36 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-15 2:57 ` ron minnich
2010-06-15 3:36 ` ron minnich
2010-06-12 20:15 ` Richard Miller
2010-06-12 20:30 ` ron minnich
2010-06-12 22:15 ` Charles Forsyth
2010-06-13 0:04 ` ron minnich [this message]
2010-06-13 13:32 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-13 22:34 ` Charles Forsyth
2010-06-13 9:00 ` Richard Miller
2010-06-11 14:49 ` Philippe Anel
2010-06-11 14:59 ` ron minnich
2010-06-11 15:02 ` ron minnich
2010-06-11 15:04 ` erik quanstrom
2010-06-11 15:43 ` ron minnich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTinYy93SV-2xTKvQiYRo0p_2OPrUJPBKrU6A02HL@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rminnich@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).