From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6b21211797cc4b5ff93802313f2fd94c@terzarima.net>
References: <AANLkTinAnAA6+ky9qn29tuAqjTx2SUmVW258CRzoN4B=@mail.gmail.com>
	<6b21211797cc4b5ff93802313f2fd94c@terzarima.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:50:12 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTingY5En8LZe1s5YcCHObdyjJ3+v6gf7sv8ds0ov@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] A little more ado about async Tclunk
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 71dca276-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
>> things up with standard (as opposed to synthetic) file systems?
>
> why should a "synthetic" file system (actually they are all synthetic, i think)
> be considered not "standard"? i thought file systems were the common currency in the system.
>

correct, it seems to have caused confusion all around.  Perhaps
s/standard/disk/g

      -eric