On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:07 AM, EBo <ebo@sandien.com> wrote:

> Does anyone use 9P2000.u anymore?
>> Can we just remove it from the p9p tree?
>>
>
> Last summer when I was banging my head against the bug in alloctree I got
> it all to work when I removed 9P2000.u and some other stuff from
> lib9p/srv.c.  At that time I got a comment back that the patches I proposed
> would likely not be accepted, in part because I removed the 9P2000.u code...
>
> If there are no objections to removing 9P2000.u, I can tell you that
> migrating p9p's srv.c code back to Plan 9's version does in fact fix the
> bugs in Tree.  I was simply not sure how many of the changes had to be
> reverted to make alloctree work properly.
>
>
>
It seems like a good idea to removing .u.  I think I can add .u back to some
other 9P implementations I have if I want it.

Dave


>  EBo --
>
>
>