On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:07 AM, EBo <ebo@sandien.com> wrote:

Does anyone use 9P2000.u anymore?
Can we just remove it from the p9p tree?

Last summer when I was banging my head against the bug in alloctree I got it all to work when I removed 9P2000.u and some other stuff from lib9p/srv.c. At that time I got a comment back that the patches I proposed would likely not be accepted, in part because I removed the 9P2000.u code...

If there are no objections to removing 9P2000.u, I can tell you that migrating p9p's srv.c code back to Plan 9's version does in fact fix the bugs in Tree. I was simply not sure how many of the changes had to be reverted to make alloctree work properly.

It seems like a good idea to removing .u. I think I can add .u back to some other 9P implementations I have if I want it.

Dave

EBo --