From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:08:49 -0800 Message-ID: From: Jason Dreisbach To: 9fans@9fans.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53f909706d13b049d16d748 Subject: [9fans] Small Plan9 box suggestions. Topicbox-Message-UUID: b47d3e60-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --bcaec53f909706d13b049d16d748 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, Can anyone help shed some light in my search for a "low power" minimal plan 9 hardware setup to start experimenting with. Has anyone had success running plan 9 on a Fit PC (the only atom box we have access to)? Gumstix would be ideal, but their plan 9 support is a bit half baked right now. Wireless support would be a huge plus. We are trying to do a bit of research into robotic applications of plan 9. The p9 filesystem protocol seems like a real neat method to acquire resources of nearby "bots". Allowing for very minimal, modularized robot configurations. Any tips? Am I out of my mind? Thanks, Jason --bcaec53f909706d13b049d16d748 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all,

Can anyone help shed some light in my search for= a "low power" minimal plan 9 hardware setup to start experimenti= ng with. Has anyone had success running plan 9 on a Fit PC (the only atom b= ox we have access to)?=C2=A0

Gumstix would be ideal, but their plan 9 support is a b= it half baked right now. Wireless support would be a huge plus.
<= br>
We are trying to do a bit of research into robotic applicatio= ns of plan 9. The p9 filesystem protocol seems like a real neat method to a= cquire resources of nearby "bots". Allowing for very minimal, mod= ularized robot configurations.=C2=A0

Any tips? Am I out of my mind?

Thanks,

Jason
--bcaec53f909706d13b049d16d748--