From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d85d05dbabaaa114fb8bc463fd142c9f@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <9539b0d95f3e8292391496188285d155@terzarima.net>
	<b74f9806a482ce54d8f73f3de0ec95ff@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<AANLkTik3Ps2mPXAw55b66-QqYSGifHcctSN9dWeRkjaj@mail.gmail.com>
	<d85d05dbabaaa114fb8bc463fd142c9f@brasstown.quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  3 Feb 2011 14:16:30 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinnboBRcM_wOOhcjjvAdaHpj+DwabBHTwaeHQF+@mail.gmail.com>
From: roger peppe <rogpeppe@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely
Topicbox-Message-UUID: aabdb4a4-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i've found it very useful quite a few times.
usually with oversized log files.

On 3 February 2011 13:59, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> On Thu Feb =C2=A03 08:41:23 EST 2011, rogpeppe@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 3 February 2011 13:01, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> > i think you're better off with char*s and realloc.
>> > it's worth looking at the heavy machinery in sam
>> > and acme, though, and comparing against ed.
>>
>> i'd hesitate before trying to edit 500MB files in ed...
>>
>> nor does ed cope with arbitrary length lines.
>
> when has editing a 500mb text file ever been a problem?
>
> - erik
>
>