From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <75c69fe2dc04959d0a39fd78ab1ed81a@terzarima.net>
References: <AANLkTi=xJNE7K=QwepjDBFQ4v_Q4SvVdL7jG990wHTyO@mail.gmail.com>
	<75c69fe2dc04959d0a39fd78ab1ed81a@terzarima.net>
Date: Tue,  9 Nov 2010 09:25:39 +1100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinqNrjuj7g+kkGuLoDC8bb8LGyFVJWhS45hUNB8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 development
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 79c50db6-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

a more than fair justification.

brucee

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
>> but it seemed better just to port mk itself.
>
> the intention was to support building both inside and outside the Inferno environment,
> and neither sh nor mash were going to be as easy to reproduce
> outside Inferno as simply making mk work (more or less) inside Inferno.
> that action alone wasn't intended to represent any vision for the future.
>
>