From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTingY5En8LZe1s5YcCHObdyjJ3+v6gf7sv8ds0ov@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinAnAA6+ky9qn29tuAqjTx2SUmVW258CRzoN4B=@mail.gmail.com>
	<6b21211797cc4b5ff93802313f2fd94c@terzarima.net>
	<AANLkTingY5En8LZe1s5YcCHObdyjJ3+v6gf7sv8ds0ov@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:59:17 +1100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinuQg11-vW0iSXhXObkNhsBSFR1nTBqpzJhekGk@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] A little more ado about async Tclunk
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 71f81af6-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

this discussion was more interesting in thev UNIX room. froggie hasn't
hung up yet thru a serious thrashing this evening - and all the FSs
are synthetic - it has no disk.

as much as i like philosophizing that's not my way.

brucee

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>=
 wrote:
>>> things up with standard (as opposed to synthetic) file systems?
>>
>> why should a "synthetic" file system (actually they are all synthetic, i=
 think)
>> be considered not "standard"? i thought file systems were the common cur=
rency in the system.
>>
>
> correct, it seems to have caused confusion all around. =A0Perhaps
> s/standard/disk/g
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0-eric
>
>