From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20101115032531.GB27578@opal.ai.ki> <20101115051625.GD27578@opal.ai.ki> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:15:40 +0100 Message-ID: From: Gorka Guardiola To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p vs http Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7ebf081c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Gorka Guardiola wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Sam Watkins wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:20:00PM -0500, John Floren wrote: >>> Please see lsub's Op and my Streaming talk at the most recent IWP9. >> >> Ok, thanks. =A0I did not know that 9p has latency problems even when rea= ding a >> single file. =A0I was talking about pipelining, where you can ask the se= rver to >> send a dozen files or chunks all of metadata all in a single packet. =A0= As I >> said, I think this might be useful even within a site. >> >> Do you think http has any disadvantages compared to 9p? > > Permissions, namespaces... By namespaces I mean qid's , the notion that a file is the same if the name isn't. --=20 - curiosity sKilled the cat