From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 10:37:58 +0200 Message-ID: From: To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: [9fans] acme design Topicbox-Message-UUID: 91d7b894-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > "normal" frames (which seems good - they break the "all text is > equal" theme that's present elsewhere) but then introduces several > (at least two, possibly more i can't see) new types of "special" > frames.=20 isn't a tag "line" a special frame that [currently] behaves differently = from "normal" one?? my "tag frame" i think could behave just normal, bringing up the frame = named bz text as it does in usual frame, so does the "command frame" with ,maybe, one = exception that it must not=20 apply commands to itself, but to the last touched frame, which it must = know ... however, it doesn't need to differ from current behavior of a tagline, does it? > this adds more modes to the operation of the interface, i hope it does not... > which is bad.=20 would be. ++pac.