Re: [9fans] exportfs / u9fs / v9fs / npfs / spfs versus 9vx

[Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 722 bytes --]

i use u9fs regularly; i install it on any unix machine i'm required
to care about. these days that's only os x boxes, and the source
in the distribution builds without issue for me there. i can dig up
the configuration if that'd be helpful, but it's for launchd (apple's
inetd replacement). i believe a few folks have posted examples
to 9fans in the past.

u9fs has the advantage of doing (most of) plan9 auth, which is
often neglected by other implementations. it's a bit weird (you
store a key on the server, which means you likely want to
create a new user for that purpose), but it works.

the wiki's been misbehaving the last few times i've tried; if it's
better, i'll document what i did there.

a


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 201 bytes --]