From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) From: Rui Carmo In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:35:46 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1799452333.7330135.1514744928423.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1799452333.7330135.1514744928423@mail.yahoo.com> <0C27ADF2-82BC-4F7F-9AA0-6D219789C3DE@quintile.net> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Inferno on microcontrollers Topicbox-Message-UUID: c83f49fe-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > On 31 Dec 2017, at 20:43, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 >> i would be very happy to see a modern browser on plan9, though >> i would not want anyone to spend a lot of time supporting one. >=20 >> in the meantime i just use remote desktop to a windows box. >=20 > what's the difference really? i also remote into a windows box, from > my linux box. and i drawterm into my 9front box. why not have all of > those, at the same time, instead of faking one to be more like the > other? >=20 Perhaps because then you wouldn=E2=80=99t need those other boxes as = much? I find the notion of having a minimal self-sufficient environment = (i.e., one with creature comforts like a browser to read documentation) = interesting - and achievable on other operating systems. R.