From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:53:08 -0700
From: Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@sun.com>
In-reply-to: <13426df10907312241q409b9f9w412974485aec7fee@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-id: <B61E3BA7-2399-4D30-9ADC-B7EBFAFE8CF4@sun.com>
References: <1248914582.479.7837.camel@work.SFBay.Sun.COM>
	<140e7ec30907300931v3dbd8ebdl32a6b74792be144@mail.gmail.com>
	<28CF259C-21F4-4071-806E-6D5DA02C985D@sun.com>
	<13426df10907312241q409b9f9w412974485aec7fee@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] ceph
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 342fe024-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Jul 31, 2009, at 10:41 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> I'm not a big fan of lustre. In fact I'm talking to someone who really
> wants 9p working well so he can have lustre on all but a few nodes,
> and those lustre nodes export 9p.


What are your clients running? What are their requirements as
far as POSIX is concerned? How much storage are talking about?

I'd be interested in discussing some aspects of what you're trying to
accomplish with 9P for the HPC guys.

Thanks,
Roman.

P.S. If it is ok with everybody else -- I'll keep the conversation on
the list.