From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Brantley Coile In-reply-to: <20160831064010.GE19159@wopr> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 03:58:18 -0400 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: References: <20160831034806.GB19159@wopr> <957d9161a8fd44eb4411d5bf173ae80b@9netics.com> <20160831064010.GE19159@wopr> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Is 9Fans dead or alive Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9a902050-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Funny you should mention uptime. A few days ago someone sent us a system sta= tus report we use to support our Plan 9 based SR customers and their system h= ad been up for over 2,000 days. I thought our file server being up two years= was impressive ... Until I saw that.=20 Sent from my iPad > On Aug 31, 2016, at 2:40 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: >=20 > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:52:31PM -0700, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: >>> plan 9 as more than a masturbatory aid. >>=20 >> put up or shut up: >=20 > Sorry, I can't win uptime games, as the kernel I use is maintained. > To my great regret, instead of six hundred 50MFLOPS computers I don't > use, I only have three or four real computers that I do :( >=20 > Congratulations on your accomplishments! >=20 > khm >=20