From: "Federico G. Benavento" <benavento@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Mousing is faster than typing but users do not believe it
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:34:07 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=e1VCDmi7u1YMfkwFZccoSXp-MgQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinmRnob5k7BZ8v3UBg5_CuvWn1J3w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Guilherme Lino <guih.lino@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:31 PM, simon softnet <ph.softnet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some people's contribution to this discussion is really null and
>> irritating..
>> They go like "Pfff Apple did this for the customers! oh yeah, and by the
>> way, the keyboard is faster in general"
>> Well, at least apple has indeed made the effort to publish a research!
>> Attracting customers or not, this doesn't mean apple's research is
>> necessarily false.
>> What do you base your arguments on?
>
> if thats your contribute then your null and irritating
>
> you just need to read the post and links on this post to understand, that
> this is a non sense.
>
> once upon the time i also liked to be with one hand on my lap and the other
> playing with mouse, but i took the time to learn something different like
> "KEEP YOUR DAM HANDS ON THE KEYBOARD!", and thats what I'm defending. i
> still have a windows for gaming but my daily routine is on a terminal
> (started with vim, and then arch linux, dwm, urxvt, zsh, vimperator) which
> all i took the time to learn and configure. I'm with just almost with 8
> months of this unix, vim, linux, command line , plain text, shortcuts thing
> and every day i learn something new, a new shortcut that will make me even
> faster, and I'm not going back :D and thats i subscribed this malign list,
> cause i want to go deeper.
>
dude, you're a gamer of course you like cool ninja keyboard shortcuts, I most of
us just want to edit some text and maybe compile it later.
I particularly don't have the time to learn of those cool shortcuts
that will make my
life easier after I learn them. I'll choose notepad.exe over emacs any day, just
because I don't have to remember a random combination of keys just to save
a damn file.
> (I'm actually joining money together to buy a iMac xD so forget the
> "HATER!!" part)
>
> now if you ONLY excuse for an argument is talking to me about a research
> made more than 20 years ago with AppleLink editor and MS-DOS word processor,
> making some absurd affirmations like "taking two seconds to chose a
> shortcut" (WTF?) (who were the tested subjects? togs mother?) , requested by
> a company who is desperate to sell computers with a mouse. (ooohh but it was
> a $50 million R&D) then go no further, the mouse is for you
> if you are a person who use the PC to go to the facebook or make a school
> paper work, then the mouse is for you!
> seriously, i don't recommend that to my girlfriend, or to my friend who like
> to edit movies or use blender,
>
> now if you are in any informatics related business keyboard is the way
> (i even do all my UML diagrams in text mode with plantUML, you should check
> it out, its much more easy to concentrate on the problem rather than the
> diagram appearance)
>
>
> quote from there:
> "Command-Key Illusion. Since users do experience the illusion that
> keyboarding is faster, there is market pressure to supply them with
> "shortcuts."—even when using "shortcuts" will actually slow them down. What
> I generally recommend is supplying as many "shortcuts" as demanded by the
> market—the real market, not the programmer in the cubicle next to you. "
>
> clearly makes no sense, the market (majority of the users that usually buy
> computers) don't even care about shortcuts, 70%(guessing here) computer
> users don't care about shortcuts, maybe 30% don't know whats that, my
> girlfriend don't.. ok.. maybe CTRL-c CTRL-V (but CTRL-x is totally obscure
> to her)
> i should read:
> "As the market don't care about shortcuts, we give you the mouse, so you can
> adapt and learn and start to use easily. so we can sell more
> computers"(note: not fast or efficiency)
>
>
> i used Fences on windows with a ton of shortcuts on my desktop, still not
> fast or productive
>
> my Firefox browser only have 1 bar, the status bar (vimperator extension
> with the config (:set gui=none)), and i bet my browsing is faster than yours
> every time i want to go back, bookmark, go down up.., open a address, do a
> search, i just need to press one or two key,
> no need to be always traveling with the mouse up there
>
> people are lazy, thats why they prefer the mouse, but if you spend some time
> learning to use command line, vim, emacs, and configuring shortcuts
> everywhere, you wont be able to leave without them.
>
> I'm not saying mouses sucks and should die! of course i use the mouse to for
> daily tasks which i find more practical(like selecting text), now is the
> mouse faster than the keyboard in a general daily routine? you cant do
> nothing with the mouse! therefore not faster...
>
> "mouse is the devils way to keep you from productivity!"
>
> (just used the mouse to copy a paragraph the rest was all keyboard)
> (to long, did not read? xD)
> (sorry for my English, I'm from Portugal)
>
> cheers
>
> --
>
>
> Guilherme Lino
>
--
Federico G. Benavento
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 16:23 David Leimbach
2011-06-15 16:27 ` Jacob Todd
2011-06-15 20:19 ` errno
2011-06-15 20:30 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-06-15 20:54 ` errno
2011-06-16 5:46 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-06-16 8:54 ` errno
2011-06-15 16:48 ` dexen deVries
2011-06-15 17:10 ` Jack Norton
2011-06-15 17:16 ` John Floren
2011-06-15 18:05 ` Mauricio CA
2011-06-15 18:16 ` Connor Lane Smith
2011-06-15 18:37 ` Harri Haataja
2011-06-15 19:28 ` dexen deVries
2011-06-16 9:30 ` antonio.fin
2011-06-16 11:54 ` Gorka Guardiola
2011-06-17 7:57 ` Guilherme Lino
2011-06-17 8:14 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-06-17 9:16 ` Noah Evans
2011-06-17 14:26 ` ComeauAt9Fans@gmail.com
2011-06-17 13:55 ` Iruatã Souza
2011-06-17 15:39 ` Paul Lalonde
2011-06-17 16:09 ` Iruatã Souza
2011-06-17 16:54 ` Bakul Shah
2011-06-17 16:59 ` Harri Haataja
2011-06-17 17:29 ` andrew zerger
2011-06-17 18:03 ` Bakul Shah
2011-06-21 16:48 ` [9fans] Mousing is faster than typing but users " William Cowan
2011-06-21 17:20 ` Jack Johnson
2011-06-21 17:42 ` errno
2011-06-21 18:04 ` Jack Johnson
2011-06-21 19:42 ` errno
2011-06-17 18:52 ` [9fans] Mousing is faster than typing but users do " errno
2011-06-17 10:05 ` antonio.fin
2011-06-17 10:44 ` Gorka Guardiola
2011-06-17 10:14 ` Oleg Finkelshteyn
2011-06-17 10:23 ` Rob Pike
2011-06-17 10:33 ` Gabriel Díaz López de la llave
2011-06-17 10:36 ` Rogelio Serrano
2011-06-17 11:19 ` dexen deVries
2011-06-17 12:22 ` hiro
2011-06-17 12:31 ` simon softnet
2011-06-17 19:23 ` Guilherme Lino
2011-06-17 19:34 ` Federico G. Benavento [this message]
2011-06-17 20:41 ` dorin bumbu
2011-06-17 20:49 ` Steve Simon
2011-06-17 19:47 ` John Floren
2011-06-17 21:42 ` David Leimbach
2011-06-17 23:03 ` simon softnet
2011-06-18 0:35 ` David Leimbach
2011-06-18 0:44 ` simon softnet
2011-06-18 0:56 ` John Floren
2011-07-04 17:30 ` [9fans] Mousing muscle memory (was: Mousing is faster than typing but users do not believe it) Ethan Grammatikidis
2011-07-04 20:05 ` hiro
2011-07-04 21:21 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2011-07-04 20:44 ` EBo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=e1VCDmi7u1YMfkwFZccoSXp-MgQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=benavento@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).